ConsentPixel – Privacy · Verified

CIPA Cases

Podraza v. Nourish, Inc.
CIPA Cases

Podraza v. Nourish, Inc.

A federal court let both a CIPA §631 wiretap claim and a federal Wiretap Act claim survive dismissal against a telehealth provider — because the site relied on browsewrap consent that the court found inadequate. It’s one of 2026’s clearest warnings that a passive “notice on the page” is not consent.

Podraza v. Nourish, Inc. Read Post »

Ortiz v. Foris Dax, Inc. (Crypto.com)
CIPA Cases

Ortiz v. Foris Dax (Crypto.com) — CIPA Case Deep-Dive

The plaintiffs clicked “Disable All” — and, they allege, the tracking kept running anyway. A federal court dismissed their wiretapping claim but let the pen-register claim proceed, in one of the most thorough federal endorsements yet of the theory that cookies can be illegal “pen registers.” Here’s the full breakdown, and why the “Disable All” detail should worry every site with a consent banner.

Ortiz v. Foris Dax (Crypto.com) — CIPA Case Deep-Dive Read Post »

Scroll to Top