ConsentPixel – Privacy · Verified

⚖️ For law firms & legal professionals

A partner for your clients' privacy cases

You handle the case. We handle the site.

When a client comes to you with a CIPA demand letter, you run the legal response — assess it, defend it, advise. But the website is still firing trackers before consent, and until that's fixed it just gets flagged again. That's where ConsentPixel comes in: the technical remediation that makes your legal remedy actually hold. Recommend us, or work the client alongside us.

Talk to us about working together → See how it works

No referral fees. No fee-sharing. Just a clean technical fix your clients can rely on.

Every week
Defense firms report inbound CIPA-letter inquiries "hardly a week goes by" without one
1,000+
CIPA lawsuits filed in 2025 alone, with demand letters running well beyond that
Re-flagged
A site that settles but doesn't fix the tracking stays a public target for the next scan
10 min
From scan to a compliant site — the technical remediation is fast and affordable

The moment your client walks in

The legal fix and the technical fix are two different jobs

A demand letter is both a legal problem and an engineering problem. You own the first. Leaving the second unsolved is why clients settle, relax, and get hit again. Here's how the two tracks run together.

📩

The letter arrives

Your client gets a CIPA demand — often templated, citing trackers firing before consent, with a settlement number attached.

Client → you
⚖️

You run the legal response

Evaluate the claim, respond, negotiate or defend, advise on settlement and risk. This is your work — it stays your work.

The firm
▦

We fix the site in parallel

The client engages ConsentPixel to remediate: block the trackers, stand up the consent banner and log — closing the gap that created the claim.

ConsentPixel
✓

The client is actually resolved

Legal matter handled, site compliant, consent record building. The site won't fail the next scan — and your remedy holds.

Both

Two ways to work with us

Recommend us, or work the client together

Pick whichever fits your practice and the matter. Neither involves a referral fee or fee-sharing — the client engages each party directly.

A
Model A

Recommend

The simplest path. You name ConsentPixel as the technical remedy — the way you'd point a client to any vendor who fixes the underlying problem — and step back. The client signs up directly and remediates their own site.

  • Zero involvement beyond naming the fix. No account to manage, no work on your side.
  • Clean and simple — you've given the client a concrete next step, not just "go fix your website."
  • Client self-serves — one pixel, any platform, live in ten minutes from $8.99/mo.
Best when you just want to close the loop after the legal work is done.
B
Model B

Work together

Co-delivery. The client engages you for the legal response and ConsentPixel for the technical remediation, on parallel tracks. We coordinate on timing so the fix lands alongside your legal strategy — and the client gets one resolved outcome.

  • We handle the remediation directly with the client, so it's off your plate but still moving.
  • We coordinate with you on sequencing — e.g. remediating before a response is filed, if that helps.
  • The consent log starts building the record your defense may want to reference.
Best when you want a technical partner in the loop, not just a name to hand off.
⚖️

Built to respect your rules

No referral fees. No fee-sharing. By design.

We know attorney ethics rules govern referrals and fee-sharing with non-lawyers, and we've deliberately structured this so nothing crosses that line. This is a technical vendor relationship, not a referral arrangement.

  • No payment for referrals — we never pay a firm for sending a client, in any form.
  • No fee-sharing — the client pays ConsentPixel directly for the technical work; nothing is split with the firm.
  • Direct engagement — the client engages you and ConsentPixel separately, each for our own scope.
  • Your judgment governs — apply your jurisdiction's Rules of Professional Conduct as you see fit; we don't ask you to do anything that conflicts with them.

The technical remediation, in full

What we do for the client's site

When you send a client our way — or work one with us — this is the work that closes the technical gap behind the claim.

🔍

Scan & diagnose

We show exactly which trackers fire before consent on the client's site — the same view a plaintiff firm's scan produces — so the problem is visible and specific.

🚫

Block before consent

The Meta Pixel, Google Analytics, session replay, chat widgets — all held until the visitor opts in. The pre-consent firing that created the claim simply stops.

The core fix
🗄️

Stand up the consent log

An immutable, timestamped, exportable record of who consented to what and when — documentation the client (and their counsel) can reference.

The evidence
⚡

Live in 10 minutes

One script tag, any platform — WordPress, Shopify, Squarespace, custom. No developer project, no drawn-out implementation to stall the client's resolution.

🔄

Keep it compliant

Sites drift — a new marketing tag reopens exposure. We keep scanning so the client doesn't quietly fall out of compliance after the matter closes.

🇺🇸

CIPA-first, US-built

This is exactly what ConsentPixel was built for — the American wiretap-litigation problem — with CCPA and state privacy laws covered too.

Purpose-built
✉️
Have a client who just got a demand letter? Start a conversation — we'll walk you through both models and how remediation works.
Email hello@consentpixel.com →

Why point clients here

A remediation you can stand behind

🎯

It actually fixes the cause

The claim exists because trackers fired before consent. We close that specific gap — so the client isn't back in your office when the next automated scan finds the same thing.

💵

It's affordable and fast

From $8.99/mo and live in ten minutes. You're not sending a client into a six-figure enterprise implementation — it's a fix they can actually act on today.

🛡️

It reflects well on you

A privacy-first vendor that practices what it sells (we run Plausible, not Google Analytics, and our trust badge is verified). Recommending it is a clean call, not a gamble.

Let's talk about working together

Whether you want to simply recommend us or co-deliver on client matters, a short conversation is the fastest way to see the fit. No commitment, no fee arrangement.

Talk to us → See the client scan

Questions from firms

How working with us works

Is this a referral-fee arrangement?
No. There are no referral fees and no fee-sharing of any kind. We never pay a firm for sending a client, and the client pays ConsentPixel directly for the technical remediation — nothing is split with the firm. We've structured it this way specifically because we know attorney ethics rules govern referrals and fee-sharing with non-lawyers. You apply your jurisdiction's Rules of Professional Conduct as you see fit; we don't ask you to do anything that conflicts with them.Nothing here is legal or ethics advice; consult your jurisdiction's rules.
What's the difference between "recommend" and "work together"?
In the recommend model, you simply name ConsentPixel as the technical fix and the client signs up and remediates on their own — zero involvement from you beyond the recommendation. In the work-together model, the client engages both you and ConsentPixel directly, and we coordinate with you on timing so the remediation lands alongside your legal strategy. Same clean economics in both; the only difference is how hands-on you want us to be.
Who does the client actually pay, and for what?
The client pays you for legal services under your engagement, and pays ConsentPixel directly for the technical remediation (plans start at $8.99/month per domain). Two separate engagements, two separate scopes, no money flowing between the firm and ConsentPixel in either direction. That separation is the point.
How fast can a client's site actually be remediated?
Fast. A free scan takes ten seconds, installation is one script tag in the site's header (about five minutes on WordPress, Shopify, Squarespace, or a custom build), and from the moment the consent banner is published, non-essential trackers are blocked and the consent log begins. Most clients go from scan to compliant in under an afternoon — which matters when you're trying to resolve a matter, not drag it out.
Does the consent log help on the legal side?
It can. The strongest defense to a CIPA tracking claim is consent obtained before tracking began, and the practical difficulty is proving it after the fact. Once ConsentPixel is live, it keeps an immutable, timestamped record of what each visitor consented to and on which banner version — documentation you or the client's counsel can reference. How to use it in any matter is entirely a legal judgment for the firm.Not legal advice.
What if the client isn't in California?
CIPA can reach any site a California resident visits, and plaintiffs frequently stack the federal ECPA, California's CDAFA, and similar all-party-consent wiretap statutes in states like Florida and Pennsylvania. The technical fix — consent before tracking — is relevant well beyond California, so it applies whether or not the client is a California business.Not legal advice.
How do we get started?
Email hello@consentpixel.com and tell us a little about your practice and the kinds of matters you handle. We'll walk you through both models, show you exactly what the client remediation looks like, and set up whatever coordination makes sense. There's no agreement to sign to simply start recommending us.

You handle the case. We'll handle the site.

Give your clients a complete resolution — the legal remedy from you, the technical remedy from us. Recommend us, or work the matter together. No referral fees, ever.

Talk to us about working together → See the client scan

No referral fees · No fee-sharing · Client engages each party directly

CIPA · CCPA · state wiretap laws Ethics-clean by design Any platform · 10-minute fix Privacy-first — we run Plausible, not GA
Scroll to Top